Facebook IPO

As Facebook prepares to file the final price for its initial public offering after the market closes on Thursday—a price anticipated to be $38 a share, valuing the company at more than $100 billion—the financial implications of the IPO are not the only ones worth considering.  Rather, as the company explained in what is called the Form S-1 (a registration statement required by the Securities Act of 1933) that it filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, there are a number of legal consequences to becoming a publicly traded company.

Some of these concerns—which are examined under the “Risk Factors” section of the Form S-1—are ones that could reasonably be associated with any other large company that is preparing for an IPO, such as the regulatory attention such a large company can expect to receive.  In Facebook’s words, using legalese and some standard boilerplate language, “We have been subject to regulatory investigations and settlements and we expect to continue to be subject to such proceedings in the future, which could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner materially adverse to our business.”

Another important factor is the effect of “complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, and other matters.”  This latter point is of particular importance, given Facebook’s ever-expanding international presence, combined with the fact that the law in these areas is itself still developing.

However, Facebook also has plenty of legal risk factors that arise from its status as a central company in the technological field, which is governed by its own set of laws and regulations.  One issue, of course, is increased regulation of Facebook’s advertising procedures, which may face growing scrutiny as users seek enhanced privacy.  In addition, as an Internet and technology company, intellectual property regulation is particularly important, as businesses in those fields “frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation, or other violations of intellectual property or other rights.”  This is a fact which other American technology giants like Google and Apple know well.

As Facebook continues to develop its technology following the IPO, these and myriad other legal concerns will govern its growth, and hopefully help it develop into a mature and increasingly legally sophisticated company.  Moreover, the IPO will give Facebook increased public vulnerability, especially at first, that could potentially lead to an increase in litigation involving the company.  Nevertheless, in its Form S-1, Facebook has done well to confront these various issues before becoming a publicly traded company.

PrintShare
 
Phony Disabilities Fail to Pay Off for Former LIRR Employees

Eleven individuals were charged on May 3, 2012 for their participation in a fraud scheme in which hundreds of former Long Island Rail Road employees falsely claimed to have disabling injuries.  The Metropolitan Transit Authority, the parent agency of the LIRR, and the Railroad Retirement Board—the federal railroad agency that sometimes supplements disability pensions—have paid [MORE]

PrintShare
 
High Court Asked to Resolve Question of Standard for Sanctions

Litigators are hardly strangers to the threat of sanctions from adversaries for improper litigation conduct, which is often just that—an empty threat.  However, if a party does indeed move the court for sanctions, the chance that they will be granted are extremely slim, partially because the standard for sanctions based on 28 U.S.C § 1927 [MORE]

PrintShare
 
SCOTUS Hears Argument on Arizona Immigration Law

Just a few weeks after the Supreme Court heard oral argument regarding President Obama’s contested healthcare law, the Court today hears argument in State of Arizona, et al. v. United States of America, the case contesting four provisions of a controversial Arizona state statute.  The law (S.B. 1070) puts forth an aggressive immigration policy which [MORE]

PrintShare
 
Holding Attorneys Accountable for Inadequate Representation of Their Clients

In January 2012, the Supreme Court held in Maples v. Thomas that an Alabama death row inmate, Cory R. Maples, should not have been punished for missing a crucial post-conviction appeal deadline as a result of his attorneys’ ineffective representation.  On its face, the ruling appears just; it would be illogical to expect a client [MORE]

PrintShare
 
Balestriere Fariello Wins Rule 60(b)(6) Motion to Vacate, Appealing to Court's Conception of "Constructive Disappearance"

A recent victory by the attorneys at Balestriere Fariello serves as an non-traditional example of the Court’s interpretation of constructive disappearance as it relates to negligence by lawyers.  It is widely held that Rule 60(b) motions to vacate default judgments are among the most difficult to litigate successfully.  Nevertheless, on September 28, 2011, a judge [MORE]

PrintShare
 
Facebook Files Patent Counterclaim Against Yahoo

Facebook has stepped up to defend itself from Yahoo’s recent accusation of violating ten of its patents. On March 12, 2012, Yahoo filed a lawsuit in US District Court for the Northern District of California against Facebook, claiming that its alleged innovations in messaging, news feed generation, social commenting, advertising display, and privacy controls are [MORE]

PrintShare
 
Generic Drug Manufacturers Off the Hook for Failure to Warn

Last week The New York Times ran a story presenting an almost impossibly unjust picture: victims of debilitating injuries are unable to sue the manufacturers of the generic medications that made them sick, while victims of the same injuries resulting from essentially the same drugs have won multi-million dollar suits against the manufacturers of the [MORE]

PrintShare
 
New York Law School Prevails Against Dissatisfied Alumni

On Wednesday, a New York State Supreme Court judge dismissed a proposed class action by nine alumni against New York Law School, one of a nationwide series of lawsuits in which alumni sought to hold their the school liable for distributing fraudulent and misleading data regarding the employment of its graduates.  The judge presiding over [MORE]

PrintShare
 
Rutgers Webcam-Spying Trial: College Student Convicted for Invasion of Privacy

A jury in New Brunswick, New Jersey found former Rutgers student Dharun Ravi guilty of charges including invasion of privacy and bias intimidation in connection with Ravi’s roommate Tyler Clementi.  Closing arguments concluded on Tuesday for the trial, which included the testimony of thirty witnesses and lasted over three weeks. Ravi’s actions came to light [MORE]

PrintShare
© 2012 Balestriere Blog Attorney Advertising | Disclaimer Suffusion theme